IIBF Membership No.- 510340451.Regarding question with objectionable options asked in CAIIB Exam Dec 16, 2018, 11:15 am Shift, Paper 3 – Retail Banking.

Sirs,
With deep concern I, Amit Srivastava as an obedient member, want to say that in the recently held Caiib Exam Dec 2018 there was a question asked that "MCLR Calculation doesn’t depend upon which of the following ? "And the options were "a> Marginal Cost of funds b> Negative Carry of CRR c> Operating Cost d> Tenor Premium"
Now the concern is that MCLR calculation depends on all the four factors given in all the four options. Hence either the question or the options are objectionable because how can a candidate attempt such a question correctly because in the context of the question asked all the options together are inappropriate.Even if the question carry only 1 mark but it has a very significant impact on the overall exam for a candidate passing the exam and for those candidates who can’t clear the exam by only 1 mark.
Hence as a sincere candidate and iibf member I want a transparent review for the abovementioned question asked in Paper 3 – Retail Banking, 11:15 am shift exam held on Dec 16, 2018 And also there were even some more questions with options having similar situation i.e; either the question must be different or the options must be relevant so that the said questions can be correctly attempted. And It’s a matter of reputational loss for such a classy certified institute, Indian Institute of Banking and Finance, IIBF. For this, I shall really be highly obliged to you all.
Yours faithfully, Amit Srivastava Membership No. – 510340451
Caiib Dec 2018 – 11:15 am Shift

IIBF Caiib exam result

This is to inform you that I am registered member of your organization with *membership no. 500181634* The only left paper to qualify CAIIB examination organized by you was Bank Financial Management (BFM). I gave this paper on 26.02.2017 and again on 09.07.2017
but score remains same that is 49 marks and got disqualified. The score was not at all upto my expectations as according to me I marked correct answers more than what I scored in both the attempts.It disappointed me a lot.
Please provide provision of providing answerkeys for these papers so as the candidate may improve for there next attempt.
Therefore, it is my humble request that kindly re-check my BFM paper and also provide the correct answers keys for that paper so that I may analyze where I have scored wrong if so. This is for the second time I disqualified because of only 1 marks.

IIBF Caiib exam result

This is to inform you that I am registered member of your organization with *membership no. 500181634* The only left paper to qualify CAIIB examination organized by you was Bank Financial Management (BFM). I gave this paper on 26.02.2017 and again on 09.07.2017
but score remains same that is 49 marks and got disqualified. The score was not at all upto my expectations as according to me I marked correct answers more than what I scored in both the attempts.It disappointed me a lot.
There should be a provision of providing answer keys to review our papers for further improvement in next attempt.
Therefore, it is my humble request that kindly re-check my BFM paper and also provide the correct answers keys for that paper so that I may analyze where I have scored wrong if so.
This is for the second time I am facing similar disqualification just because of 1 marks.

IIBF Retail banking 11.15am to 1.15 pm batch display problem

Retail banking paper 3 of CAIIB Exam held on 17.06.2018 due to technical glitch was unable to ascertain the answers as the display of questions were invisible. And also there were very similar options to choose from for a single question which was confusing. Most of the candidates at my exam centre felt the same and unable to answer correctly due to the glitch.kindly take action